Warning: file_get_contents(https://r2.kuemeranti.store/public/mrdt/mar/elu/auth): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found in /home/tjsudsmac/public_html/index.php on line 2
@article{Egburonu_Abidoye_2021, title={Application of Faulkenberry (2018) Bayes Factor to a Balanced Two Way Analysis of Variance with Random Effects}, volume={47}, url={https://tjs.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/tjs/article/view/878}, DOI={10.4314/tjs.v47i5.20}, abstractNote={<p>The Analysis of Variance technique estimates variance components by comparing their mean squares to their expected values. Nevertheless, this method could give variance component estimates that are found outside the parameter space, i.e. negative estimates. In a bid to overcome this deficiency, alternate approaches are essential, and likelihood-based approaches have become common over time. Bayesian techniques have also been proposed and Bayes factors developed for examining various models. We applied the Bayes factor proposed by Faulkenberry (2018) to a Balanced Two Way ANOVA under three (3) cases, namely <strong>Case 1</strong>: the levels of the two factors are fixed; <strong>Case 2</strong>: the levels of the two factors are random; and <strong>Case 3</strong>: the levels of one factor are considered as fixed, while the levels of the other factor are considered as random. We realized that when the levels of the two factors are fixed, the Bayesian conclusion about the variability in the effects is in line with that of a frequentist. But when the same data set was considered to be wholly or partly as sample observations drawn randomly from a given population of interest, the Bayesian conclusion differed slightly from that of the frequentist.</p> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Bayes Factor; Bayesian; Frequentist, Fixed; Random.</p>}, number={5}, journal={Tanzania Journal of Science}, author={Egburonu, Onyeike D. and Abidoye, Omotayo A.}, year={2021}, month={Dec.}, pages={1728–1742} }